|
|
Select July 2005
Decisions
Cardinal Transportation B.C. Incorporated –and-
Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 561, BCLRB No.
B184/2005
In this case the Board rejected the employer’s
arguments that a bargaining unit of well over 100 school bus drivers and
aides was not appropriate for collective bargaining because it excluded
a number of charter bus drivers...more
RMH Teleservices International Inc. –and-
B.C. Government and Service Employees’ Union –and- B.C. Federation
of Labour –and- Business Council of B.C. –and- Coalition of
B.C. Businesses, BCLRB No. B188/2005 (Leave for Reconsideration
of BCLRB No. B345/2003)
This is an important policy decision of the
Labour Relations Board concerning unfair labour practices under the Liberal
amendments to the Labour Relations Code..more
Wal-Mart Canada Corp. -and- United
Food and Commercial Workers
International Union, Local 1518, BCLRB No. B190/2005
This was an application for certification of the employees
in the Tire and Lube Express (“TLE”) departments at seven
Wal-Mart stores across the province. The TLE departments are made up of
employees who work in service bays performing automotive services, and
employees who work in the automotive retail department inside each store.
The Union argued that a unit made up of only the TLE employees working
in the service bay was an appropriate bargaining unit, and in the alternative
that a unit made up of all employees in the TLE department was an appropriate
unit. The Board found that, while a unit made up of the service bay employees
was inappropriate, a unit of all TLE employees at the seven stores was
an appropriate unit for collective bargaining. The Board also found that,
if it was wrong and the TLE unit was not appropriate under the usual test
for appropriateness, the unit would still be appropriate under the more
relaxed standard of appropriateness applied to “traditionally difficult
to organize” sectors of the economy. The Board found that, since
the department store industry was a more difficult sector to organize
than other industries, and since Wal-Mart fell within the “department
store sector”, the more relaxed standard was applicable to the TLE
bargaining unit.
To
view a copy of the decision in Adobe Acrobat format, please click here.
Select 2006 Decicions
Select 2005 Decisions
Select 2004 Decisions
Disclaimer
The material on this website is presented for informational
purposes only and is not legal advice. You should seek appropriate legal
advice before taking any action based on information provided through
this website.
|